Small Palette Shade Review – ELF Chocolate Mint (reviewed in the comments)
Small Palette Shade Review – ELF Chocolate Mint (reviewed in the comments)
🤔 Small Palette – In-Depth Shade Review 🔍
……
➡️ NOTE: This is MY opinion & experience; regarding the shade quality. As always, use/buy the makeup that makes YOU happy. Also, none of my stuff is sponsored. I do it for fun.
……
Smaller palettes are great, but with a smaller-sized palette it is IMPERATIVE that each shade performs remarkably well. Considering you have limited options to create a look, each shade must do its job to contribute to the overall palette quality.
This review focuses on EACH shade in a palette, and lets you know which ones function as expected, and which shades are duds. At the end, you can see if the palette is mathematically worth the offering price, or if you should skip it.
Today, we are using one of the ELF MintMelt Quad palettes. This is my first time playing around with this palette, & I’m excited to see how it works.
……
⭐⭐ Legend:
+ description: color of shade
+ designation: color family shade belongs to
+ formula type: description of compound
+ pigmented: applies tinted or colorless
+ patchiness: experienced any skips or baldness in application
+ blendability: ability to smoothly blend shadow
+ kickback in pan: amount of powder released when brush touched in pan
+ fallout: amount of powder residue on my face after application
+ rating: 0/10: an opinion of the overall performance of the shadow
+ determination: whether the shade is functional for value, or a dud
……
▪️Name of Palette: ELF Cosmetics – Chocolate Mint
▪️# of Shades in Palette: 4
……
✔ RATING SCALE:
A = 9-10 / FUNCTIONAL
B = 7-8 / FUNCTIONAL
C = 5-6 / FUNCTIONAL
D = 3-4 / DUD
F = 1-2 / DUD
……
⭐ Shade 1 – Review: (Mint Green Shimmer)
+ description: mint green w/ gold reflects
+ designation: cool tone
+ formula type: shimmer
+ pigmented: yes
+ patchiness: no
+ blendability: yes
+ kickback in pan: no
+ fallout: yes
+ rating: 10/10 (A)
+ determination: functional
……
⭐ Shade 2 – Review: (Champagne Shimmer)
+ designation: neutral tone
+ formula type: shimmer
+ pigmented: yes
+ patchiness: no
+ blendability: yes
+ kickback in pan: no
+ fallout: yes
+ rating: 10/10 (A)
+ determination: functional
……
⭐ Shade 3 – Review: (Tan Matte)
+ description: light taupe
+ designation: neutral tone
+ formula type: matte
+ pigmented: yes
+ patchiness: yes
+ blendability: yes
+ kickback in pan: yes
+ fallout: no
+ rating: 7/10 (B)
+ determination: functional
……
⭐ Shade 4 – Review: (Brown Matte)
+ description: chocolate brown
+ designation: neutral tone
+ formula type: matte
+ pigmented: yes
+ patchiness: yes
+ blendability: yes
+ kickback in pan: yes
+ fallout: yes
+ rating: 4/10 (D)
+ determination: dud
……
✅ Best Performing Shade: Mint Shimmer
❌ Least Impressive Shade: Matte Brown
……
Overall Shade Performance Ratio (dud to functional): 1:3
➡️ Overall Dud Percentage = 25%
➡️ Overall Value Percentage = 75%
💲 Total Palette Cost = $4.00
💲 Total Palette Value = $3.00
……
Conclusion: Mathematically, you are ever ONLY going to get $3.00 worth of value out of this palette.
Hello melissajackson07, Thank you for contributing to r/MakeupLounge! To ensure that your post does not get removed, please make sure you have thoroughly read over the [rules](https://old.reddit.com/r/MakeupLounge/about/rules/) of our subreddit. We also require a detailed product list **including shade names** for any makeup looks. If a product does not have shade names, please attach a picture and circle what you have used so others can recreate it. If a rule is broken, your post will be removed.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/MakeupLounge) if you have any questions or concerns.*